In the United States Treaties Are Not Subject to Judicial Review

I can't wait to hear why this is different from China enforcing their new national security law against people who haven't fix foot in their country.

Nosotros don't have an extradition treaty with Communist china and we suspended our extradition treaty with Hong Kong considering we don't trust the CCP, while we nevertheless have an extradition treaty with the USA, so that'south one difference. Another difference: NZ won't extradite people unless the crime they're defendant of is a crime in New Zealand and there's a plausible instance against them. So, fifty-fifty if we had a treaty nosotros wouldn't extradite people to China for sedition against the CCP considering that'south not a crime under NZ law.

> So, even if we had a treaty nosotros wouldn't extradite people to People's republic of china for sedition against the CCP because that's not a crime under NZ law. Then it'due south not a criminal offense to call for a putsch against the NZ government? I'd be surprised if that were the case. It's a affair of framing things.

Elementary - China installed this law to punish serious crimes, east.g. the Hong Kong guy who murdered his gf in Taiwan, only could not be extradited to Taiwan and remains unpunished. Dotcom immune people 10 years ago to download movies in shitty quality from his website and made some cash from that. This is why he must be punished very hard and extradited to the US from no matter where he is on this planet.

Y'all are thinking nigh the abased Extradition Bill. The National Security Constabulary includes the ability to extradite people but only for promoting succession, spreading certain views and talking about certain things. The guy who murdered his GF in Taiwan can't be extradited to Taiwan under the NSL.

The law you lot are confusing this with was a unlike extradited law where the communist party wanting to extradite Hong Kong residence to mainland Cathay where torture and slavery for political enemies of the Chinese Communist Party are completely uninhibited. And maybe the CCP would send a murderer to their enermy the Republic of Prc, or that was irrelevant.

It's a constabulary against questioning the accented rule of the Chinese Communist Party in Hong Kong. Information technology has nothing to exercise with extradition

But what about Julian Assange or Meng Wanzhou, surely they committed grave acts confronting the American people right?

Illegal acts against American government, perhaps, not people. I know a few who commit grave acts against American people and get paid for it with no legal repercussions.

A possible reason is that it went through (or is going through) the sovereign courts of New Zealand. Another reason would be that Kim committed his for profit crimes virtually in the United states even if he was physically in New Zealand. That is, he was knowingly selling admission to copyrighted content to American consumers, with American employees, from American servers. Also, as I empathise it China's law applies broadly to a course of people (i.e Hong Kongers) whereas Kim's case is a specific legal ruling for a specific criminal.

There's also a lot of treaties about the reciprocity of copyright. Without that, copyright can be pretty useless.

Was it registered in US? Even if information technology was at that place are so many heads of corporations unpunished today just because y'all tin't sentence a company to prison, they desire to make an instance out of him. So how corrupt is the system? America World Police strikes once again.

I don't really have much sympathy for people whose business model is "I'chiliad going to sell copyrighted movies and Tv shows for my own profit without compensating the creators in any style." Surely at that place are complicated legal questions at issue, which is why this has taken and then long - but ultimately I think criminal charges against breathy for profit infringement are just.

Power to ignore one's ain hypocrisy is the main manifestation of power. Rules for thee but non for me.

"However, whatever extradition would just have place on copyright grounds since the Supreme Court has ruled that the men are not eligible to be surrendered in respect of coin laundering since there is "no matching New Zealand offense." This office e'er confuses me, Usa nevertheless tin charge him for money laundering afterward he is In U.s.a. correct?

My understanding is that "We volition extradite him on the grounds of copyright, but you cannot charge him for coin laundering." If they were to then charge him for coin laundering, then it would hateful NZ has 0 trust that whatsoever extradition to the U.s. would exist honored and future extraditions would be evermore increasingly difficult. But at the end of the day, who knows. It's the United states, they do what they want.

> If they were to then charge him for money laundering, so it would mean NZ has 0 trust that whatever extradition to the US would be honored and future extraditions would be evermore increasingly difficult. One of the more interesting points with the contempo Assange trial, was the evidence presented (by the defense) of the US breaking it's previous commitments to the Uk regime for treatment of extradited prisoners. (From memory) patently other loftier profile extraditions have just been allowed with sure attached conditions. For instance "must be supplied with their medical (diabetes or something like that?) medication", which once extradited were completely ignored. It sounded like there were several weather condition attached to these previous extraditions, and all the weather take been outright ignored. So, the trust thing you mention should (in theory) already exist on shaky basis.

They did handle DMCA requests. The principal complaint at that place is that they only deleted the copies listed in the takedown, and left other copies alone.

And then let'southward get real. Which gatekeepers and entrenched players did he rub the incorrect mode? Honestly, the perseverance in persecuting him is impressive. What did he do?

He pissed off the copyright and amusement lobbies. He flaunted the wealth he gained from a website that was normally used to share pirated content. The MPAA, RIAA and media companies all have friends in high places. Any large player not willing to play ball with the demands from the media industry can count on legal action against them at some signal. If Youtube didn't have their content ID system, they would've been raided by the FBI long agone.

I think if he had quietly disappeared information technology would be forgotten about, but he seems to crave the attending the case brings. From the dramatic retelling of "The Raid" on his website, to his bizarre coded messages hinting about Mega being stolen from him, to regularly hinting at reviving the service that the case revolves effectually, to setting up Mega.nz to his brash music videos and books, he has made himself very hard to ignore.

partlowablemody.blogspot.com

Source: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24986245

Share this post